TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Sets Aside Assessment Orders for Work Contractors under TNVAT Act - Penalties and Purchase Tax Rulings</h1> <h3>P. Rajendran, M. Krishnamoorthy, K. Annadurai Versus The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, The Assistant Commissioner (CT)</h3> P. Rajendran, M. Krishnamoorthy, K. Annadurai Versus The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, The Assistant Commissioner (CT) - TMI Issues Involved:Challenging impugned Revision of Assessment orders under TNVAT Act for work contractors regarding adhoc addition for defects in accounts without new facts or materials, based on change of opinion, and lack of detailed intra-department enquiry following web report. Imposition of penalty separately under TNVAT Act. Levying purchase tax on works contractors. Grounds for quashing impugned orders based on change of opinion, verification of assessment records, and purchase omission.Detailed Analysis:1. Revision of Assessment Orders:The petitioners, work contractors registered with the second respondent, sought to quash the impugned Revision of Assessment orders under Section 27 of the TNVAT Act. They argued that the orders were passed without new facts or materials, solely on a change of opinion, which contravenes the provisions of the TNVAT Act. The petitioners contended that the assessing officer did not conduct a detailed intra-department enquiry following the web report, as required by legal precedent. They relied on previous judgments to support their claim that the web report should only serve as a starting point for enquiry, emphasizing the need for a thorough investigation before making an assessment based on such a report.2. Imposition of Penalty:The Special Government Pleader defended the imposition of penalties by referring to the counter affidavit and a circular issued by the Office of the Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. However, the court highlighted that penalties can only be imposed under specific sections of the TNVAT Act and not through separate orders. Citing legal precedents, the court set aside the penalty orders, emphasizing that penalty imposition must form part of the assessment order and cannot be levied independently.3. Levying Purchase Tax:The court addressed the issue of levying purchase tax on the petitioners, who were works contractors engaged in civil construction. Referring to relevant legal provisions and case law, the court concluded that the petitioners, having already been taxed on other grounds, should not be additionally burdened with purchase tax. Consequently, the court set aside the orders imposing purchase tax on the petitioners.4. Grounds for Quashing Impugned Orders:The court acknowledged the petitioners' argument regarding the change of opinion as a ground for challenging the impugned proceedings. However, the court noted that the revision was not solely based on a change of opinion but also on the verification of assessment records and a web report indicating a mismatch. The court emphasized that while addressing purchase omission disclosed by the web report, the assessing officer must adhere to the procedure outlined in a specific circular issued by the Office of the Principal Secretary/Commissioner of Commercial Taxes.5. Final Decision:Ultimately, the court allowed the Writ Petitions, setting aside the impugned orders and remitting the matter to the second respondent for fresh orders in compliance with the law. The court did not impose any costs on the petitioners and closed the connected miscellaneous petitions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
