Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit distributed by the Indian Leaf Tobacco Division, functioning as an Input Service Distributor, could be availed by the assessee, and whether the demand of Cenvat credit, interest and penalty was sustainable.
Analysis: The division was held to be an integral part of the assessee and not a separate legal entity. The registration as an Input Service Distributor under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 enabled distribution of service tax paid input credit to the manufacturing units. The Court applied the settled position that, under Rule 7, the distribution of credit is constrained only by the amount of service tax paid and by the restriction against distribution to a unit exclusively engaged in exempted goods or exempted services. The Court also relied on the fact that the Revenue had accepted the assessee's entitlement for later assessment periods on the same issue, and therefore could not take a different stand in the present matter.
Conclusion: The credit distributed through the Input Service Distributor was validly availed by the assessee, and the demand raised by the Revenue was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The substantial questions of law were answered against the Revenue, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A registered Input Service Distributor may validly distribute credit in accordance with Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the Revenue cannot arbitrarily depart from an accepted position on the same issue for subsequent periods.