Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods could be treated as covered by the existing import licence by applying the principle of interchangeability, and whether the orders of confiscation and redemption fine were sustainable when the show-cause notice proceeded on a different classification from the one ultimately relied upon by the revisional authority.
Analysis: The import policy for the relevant period permitted interchangeability between the quota licences for studio electric and projector bulbs and for cinema machinery and parts thereof. The notice issued to the importer proceeded on the footing that the goods required a specific licence under one classification, while the revisional authority later attempted to classify them under a different residuary entry. The importer was not given an opportunity to meet that new basis. On the proper reading of the policy, the interchangeable licence category covered the goods imported, and the contrary view taken by the authorities was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The confiscation order and the alternative redemption fine were set aside, and the import was held to be covered by the licence by virtue of interchangeability.