Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The application was filed more than three years after the last payment and beyond the limitation period applicable to insolvency applications. No application for condonation of delay was filed. The limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governs applications under the Code from the inception of the Code, and the right to sue accrues on default. If the default is older than three years, the application is barred unless delay is condoned under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Conclusion: The application was barred by limitation and was dismissed as not maintainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 is subject to Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and where default occurred more than three years before filing without condonation of delay, the application is barred.