Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate insolvency resolution process could be withdrawn on the basis of settlement and the consent of the sole member of the committee of creditors, and the incidental directions as to insolvency resolution process costs and restoration of the suspended board.
Analysis: The application for withdrawal was moved under Section 12A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 read with Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016 and Rule 11 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016. Form FA was filed by the operational creditor after settlement, the sole member of the committee of creditors recorded no objection, and the resolution process had not progressed beyond the preliminary stage. The Tribunal also considered the unresolved insolvency resolution process costs, including professional and litigation expenses incurred during the process, and found it to direct payment of the balance amount by the corporate debtor.
Conclusion: The withdrawal of the corporate insolvency resolution process was granted. The pending applications were closed, the balance insolvency resolution process cost was directed to be paid by the corporate debtor, and the powers of the board of directors stood restored.