Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rent receivables purchased by the applicant under the rental documents constituted a financial debt, and whether the applicant was entitled to be treated as a financial creditor in the corporate insolvency resolution process.
Analysis: The transaction was examined under the definition of financial debt in Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, with emphasis on whether the liability arising from the lease arrangement was, in substance, a finance lease and whether the receivables had been discounted for the time value of money. The rental agreement permitted assignment of rights, and the applicant's purchase of rent receivables was treated as an assignment of a financial asset arising from a financing arrangement rather than a mere operational lease. On the terms of the documents, the arrangement was found to have the commercial character of borrowing and the applicant's claim was not defeated by the respondent's rejection.
Conclusion: The rent receivables constituted financial debt, and the applicant was entitled to be admitted as a financial creditor in respect of Term Loan II.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a lease or receivables arrangement, on its terms and substance, transfers the economic incidents of financing and is discounted for the time value of money, the resultant claim can fall within financial debt under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 and the assignee of such receivables may be recognised as a financial creditor.