TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court grants merchant exporter IGST refund for exported goods, orders respondent to pay with interest.</h1> <h3>M/s. Raj Exim Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Union of India</h3> M/s. Raj Exim Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Union of India - 2022 (67) G.S.T.L. 563 (Mad.) Issues:1. Refund of IGST paid by the petitioner for exported goods.Analysis:The petitioner, a merchant exporter, filed a Writ Petition seeking a directive for the refund of IGST amounting to Rs. 2,35,008 paid on goods exported. The petitioner highlighted the provisions of Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017, stating that the shipping bill submitted by an exporter is considered an application for IGST refund on exported goods. The petitioner emphasized that despite fulfilling all requirements and exporting goods in September 2017, the IGST refund had not been processed by the respondent authorities, leading to the filing of the Writ Petition.The petitioner's counsel referenced a previous judgment to support their case, emphasizing that the issue at hand has been addressed by various courts, including the Madras High Court. The judgment cited highlighted the entitlement of exporters to IGST refund upon fulfilling specified conditions, irrespective of any circulars that may suggest otherwise. The judgment stressed the binding nature of court decisions over circulars, emphasizing that circulars contrary to statutory provisions hold no legal weight. Additionally, a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court had previously directed the refund of IGST in a similar case, further strengthening the petitioner's argument.Consequently, the court found the previous judgment directly applicable to the current case and allowed the Writ Petition. The respondent was directed to refund the IGST amount of Rs. 2,35,008 along with 9% interest to the petitioner within six weeks from the date of receiving the court order. The court's decision was based on the legal entitlement of the petitioner to the IGST refund for the zero-rated supplies exported, in line with the relevant statutory provisions and previous judicial interpretations.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
