TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to bail in proceedings arising from alleged offences under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application was moved under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in relation to allegations under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court noted the rival contentions regarding the petitioner's role, the alleged fake invoices, and the magnitude of the tax credit involved, and found no reason to exercise discretion in favour of bail.
Conclusion: Bail was declined.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
