Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2021 (4) TMI 1166 - HC - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court quashes ex-parte penalty order due to procedural violations, grants fresh hearing opportunity The court quashed the ex-parte order imposing a personal penalty on the petitioner, citing violations of natural justice principles due to inadequate ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Court quashes ex-parte penalty order due to procedural violations, grants fresh hearing opportunity

                              The court quashed the ex-parte order imposing a personal penalty on the petitioner, citing violations of natural justice principles due to inadequate notice and lack of opportunity for a personal hearing. The court directed the authority to serve the show cause notice to the petitioner's official email and address, granting a fresh decision opportunity with full hearing rights. The court allowed the writ petition under Article 226, bypassing the statutory appeal process due to the severe breach of natural justice. The decision refrained from addressing case merits, leaving further contentions for appropriate forums.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Legality and validity of the ex-parte order imposing personal penalty.
                              2. Service of show cause notice and notice of personal hearing.
                              3. Breach of the principles of natural justice.
                              4. Maintainability of the petition due to the availability of alternative statutory remedies.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Legality and Validity of the Ex-Parte Order Imposing Personal Penalty:

                              The petitioner challenged the ex-parte order dated 11.02.2019, passed by the Principal Commissioner of Central Excise and GST, which imposed a personal penalty of Rs. 2,28,65,888/- under Rule 15(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The petitioner argued that the order was passed without serving a show cause notice and without providing an opportunity for a personal hearing, thus violating principles of natural justice.

                              2. Service of Show Cause Notice and Notice of Personal Hearing:

                              The petitioner claimed that no show cause notice dated 10.10.2017 was received, and the order was passed ex-parte. The respondent argued that the show cause notice was sent via speed post to the petitioner’s residential address but was returned with the remark "Left." Consequently, the notice was affixed on the notice board under Section 37(C) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The respondent also stated that multiple notices for personal hearings were issued and affixed at the company premises.

                              3. Breach of the Principles of Natural Justice:

                              The petitioner emphasized that the imposition of a personal penalty without serving the show cause notice and without providing an opportunity for a personal hearing was a breach of the principles of natural justice. The court noted that the petitioner had left the company in June 2016, and the show cause notice was issued in 2017. The court found that the respondent failed to serve the show cause notice and personal hearing notices at the petitioner’s last known address, despite having access to the petitioner’s updated address from the Income Tax Department records.

                              4. Maintainability of the Petition Due to the Availability of Alternative Statutory Remedies:

                              The respondent raised a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of the petition, arguing that the petitioner should have appealed to the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) as provided under Section 35(B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court acknowledged the statutory requirement of pre-depositing 7.5% of the penalty amount before filing an appeal. However, the court decided to entertain the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India due to the gross violation of principles of natural justice.

                              Conclusion:

                              The court quashed and set aside the ex-parte order to the extent concerning the present petitioner, emphasizing the necessity of serving the show cause notice and providing an opportunity for a personal hearing. The court directed that the show cause notice be served to the petitioner’s official email ID and future correspondence be sent to the petitioner’s address as mentioned in the cause title. The matter was remanded to the concerned authority for a fresh decision, ensuring the fullest opportunity for the petitioner to be heard. The court refrained from commenting on the merits of the case, leaving all contentions open for the parties to agitate before the appropriate forum.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found