Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal admits petition under Insolvency Code, appoints Resolution Professional</h1> <h3>Vipul Harshad Raja Versus Simandhar Broking Limited</h3> Vipul Harshad Raja Versus Simandhar Broking Limited - TMI Issues Involved:1. Whether the applicant qualifies as a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.2. Whether the respondent, being a stock broking company, qualifies as a Financial Service Provider (FSP) and is thus excluded from the definition of a Corporate Debtor.3. Whether the debt claimed by the applicant is due and in default.4. Whether the petition meets the requirements for admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.Detailed Analysis:1. Qualification of Applicant as Financial Creditor:The applicant filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking reliefs under Section 7(5)(a) and Section 13(1)(a)(b)(c) of the Code. The applicant provided finance and security margin to the respondent since 26.12.2017, amounting to Rs. 1,01,74,984.56 by way of actual payments and Rs. 2,58,93,350 by way of shares and securities. The applicant furnished copies of bank statements and ledgers to support the claim of unpaid debt by the corporate debtor. The respondent contended that the applicant does not fall under the definition of a financial creditor as defined under Section 5(7) of the Code, arguing that the applicant was merely a client of the respondent company for stock trading.2. Qualification of Respondent as Financial Service Provider (FSP):The respondent argued that it is a Financial Service Provider (FSP) within the meaning of Section 3(17) of the Code, being registered with SEBI as a stockbroker, and thus does not fall under the definition of Corporate Person under Section 3(7) of the Code. The respondent relied on various judgments to support this claim. However, the tribunal observed a thin line of difference between the provisions of Section 3(16)(e) and the business activities of the respondent. The tribunal concluded that the respondent, being directly involved in buying, selling, or subscribing to financial products for and on behalf of the applicant, does not qualify as an FSP but falls under the definition of a Corporate Debtor.3. Debt Due and Default:The tribunal found that the applicant had provided finance and security margin to the respondent, and the respondent had not shown any documents regarding the filing of any suit/legal proceedings for the recovery of the claimed amount. The applicant furnished multiple ledgers and bank statements to show that the debt had not been paid and that the corporate debtor was unable to pay its debts. The tribunal observed discrepancies and illegalities in the ledgers and invoices issued by the respondent, indicating manipulation to avoid liability. The tribunal concluded that the debt is due and there is a default on the part of the corporate debtor.4. Requirements for Admission under Section 7:The tribunal noted that the amount of debt payable by the respondent is more than the statutory limit prescribed under Section 4 of the Code. The applicant furnished the copy of Written Communication of the Proposed Interim Resolution Professional in Form-2. The tribunal concluded that the application is complete in all respects and the corporate debtor has committed default in paying the dues to the applicant. The tribunal was satisfied that the requirements of Section 7 of the Code were fulfilled, and thus, the petition deserved to be admitted.Conclusion:The petition was admitted, and a moratorium was declared prohibiting the institution or continuation of suits or proceedings against the corporate debtor, transferring or disposing of assets, and recovery of property by an owner or lessor. The tribunal appointed an Interim Resolution Professional to act under Section 13(1)(b) of the Code. The order of moratorium shall continue until the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process or until the tribunal approves a resolution plan or passes an order for liquidation.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found