Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether mild steel rounds and rods manufactured from duty-paid mild steel ingots were exempt from excise duty under Notification No. 206/63 as amended by Notification No. 123/65 when the ingots were cut or broken before being rolled.
Analysis: The exemption applied to iron and steel products falling under sub-item (ia) of Item 26AA of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, provided they were manufactured from duty-paid ingots that were cut or broken but not rolled. The relevant condition was satisfied if the ingots were cut or broken in the factory before rolling, and the notification did not require that the ingots must have been cut or broken at the point of supply. The products manufactured by the petitioners fell within Item 26AA(ia), the ingots were duty paid, and the record showed that they were treated as scrap and then re-rolled. On this construction, the exemption could not be denied merely because the ingots were not initially supplied in a cut or broken condition.
Conclusion: The petitioners were entitled to the exemption, and the demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: For the exemption under the notification to apply, duty-paid ingots need only be cut or broken and not rolled before being converted into the specified rolled products; the place where cutting or breaking occurs is immaterial if that condition is met.