Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether plastic crates used for storing and transporting raw materials and finished goods within the factory qualify as inputs eligible for Cenvat credit, on the footing that they are used in or in relation to manufacture of final products.
Analysis: The credit was denied below only on the premise that the crates were used for storage and internal transportation, and therefore were not used in or in relation to manufacture. The governing expression "in relation to" has a wide ambit and is intended to enlarge the scope of inputs so as to cover goods that are essential to the manufacturing activity even if they do not form part of the finished product. Where the manufacturing process cannot be efficiently carried on without the use of such goods for proper storage, segregation, preservation, and handling of raw materials, the nexus with manufacture is established.
Conclusion: The plastic crates were eligible inputs and Cenvat credit was admissible; the finding below was incorrect and the appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods that are essential to the manufacturing process and have a direct nexus with the efficient production of final goods fall within "inputs" when used in or in relation to manufacture, even if they are employed only for storage or internal handling and do not enter the finished product.