Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether regular bail should be granted in a customs case alleging illegal import and smuggling of foreign-origin exotic animals and birds, in the absence of import documents and in the context of seizure under the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis: The petitioners were found in possession of foreign-origin animals and birds for which no supporting documents of lawful import, purchase, or transport were produced. The materials indicated that the goods were of substantial value, were allegedly brought through a route not specified for import, and the surrounding circumstances gave rise to a reasonable belief of smuggling or illegal import. In such a situation, the customs officers were empowered to seize the goods as articles liable to confiscation, and the statutory burden under the customs law operated against the person from whose possession the goods were recovered. The nature of the offence, the value of the seized articles, and the need for further investigation were also relevant against grant of bail.
Conclusion: Bail was not granted.
Final Conclusion: The application for regular bail was refused and the accused were left to remain in custody for the investigation in the customs matter.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are seized on reasonable belief of smuggling and the accused fails to produce lawful import or possession documents, the statutory burden under the customs law justifies seizure and weighs against grant of bail.