TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Operational Creditor Prevails in Insolvency Petition: Moratorium Imposed to Protect Assets</h1> <h3>Sumiran Foods Private Limited Versus Pankaj Events & Celebrations Private Limited</h3> Sumiran Foods Private Limited Versus Pankaj Events & Celebrations Private Limited - TMI Issues:- Petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016- Default in payment of operational debt by the corporate debtor- Adjudicating the admission of the application and declaring a moratoriumAnalysis:1. The applicant, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against the respondent, a private limited company engaged in the business of trading and selling food products. The applicant alleged that the respondent failed to clear outstanding dues despite repeated promises and assurances.2. The applicant provided evidence of the debt, including invoices, delivery challans, and a demand notice. The respondent, despite multiple opportunities, did not file a reply to the application. The applicant demonstrated that the default occurred on 16.08.2019, and the respondent changed advocates during the process.3. The Adjudicating Authority examined the completeness of the petition, the existence of a debt, and the occurrence of default. It was found that the applicant had met all requirements, and there was no pre-existing dispute regarding the operational debt from the respondent's side.4. Referring to the Mobilox case, the Authority assessed the operational debt exceeding Rs. 1.00 lac, the due and payable status of the debt, and the absence of any dispute from the respondent. The Authority concluded that the operational debt was due and payable, fulfilling the requirements of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code.5. Consequently, the Authority invoked Section 13 of the Code to declare a moratorium, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed, and the moratorium was imposed to prohibit various actions against the corporate debtor, ensuring the continuation of essential services.6. The order of moratorium was to remain in effect until the completion of the corporate insolvency resolution process or until the approval of a resolution plan or liquidation. The Registry was directed to notify the Registrar of Companies about the corporate insolvency resolution process to avoid any actions detrimental to the process.
TaxTMI 