Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment made for use of the trade mark was royalty chargeable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and, consequently, whether the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under section 195.
Analysis: The payment was made under a licence arrangement by which the assessee was permitted to use the trade mark on its products. The agreement showed that the licensor owned the mark and granted a non-exclusive licence to use it in connection with sale, promotion and advertising of the products. On these facts, the payment was held to be in the nature of royalty within the meaning of Explanation 2(i) to section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Once the payment was treated as royalty, the obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195 followed. The objection that the payment was recurring and therefore not royalty was rejected.
Conclusion: The payment was royalty and the assessee was liable to deduct tax at source under section 195. The findings under section 201(1) and the consequential interest under section 201(1A) were sustained.
Final Conclusion: The additions and withholding tax liability were upheld, and the assessee's appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A payment made for a contractual licence to use a trade mark on products constitutes royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, attracting the obligation to deduct tax at source under section 195.