Tribunal upholds deletion of disallowances on commissions, citing ample evidence and increased business revenue.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the disallowances of commissions paid to both M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd. and M/s. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal found that the assessee provided ample evidence supporting the commission payments, leading to increased business revenue. It criticized the AO for lack of thorough investigation and affirmed that the commissions were legitimate and commercially beneficial.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of commission paid to M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd.
2. Disallowance of commission paid to M/s. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Commission Paid to M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd.:

The Revenue appealed against the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 2,66,91,976/- paid as commission to M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed this commission on the grounds that the assessee failed to provide documentary evidence to prove the genuineness of the claim and the actual services rendered by the foreign agent. Despite the assessee submitting agreements, invoices, and bank payment details, the AO doubted the transaction due to the absence of credentials of M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd. and its representative in a Google search.

On appeal, the CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence. The CIT(A) emphasized that the assessee's business increased significantly due to the efforts of the commission agent, resulting in substantial revenue. The CIT(A) also pointed out that the AO did not conduct any third-party enquiries or bring contrary evidence to substantiate the disallowance. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the commission was paid for genuine business purposes and was commercially expedient.

2. Disallowance of Commission Paid to M/s. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd.:

The Revenue also appealed against the deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 69,74,865/- paid as commission to M/s. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd. The AO disallowed this commission, questioning the reasonableness of the transaction and the lack of evidence for the business expenditure. The assessee had procured orders for Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd. and provided agreements, invoices, and bank details to substantiate the payment.

The CIT(A) deleted the addition, noting that the assessee had provided all necessary documents and that the commission payment was linked to increased business revenue. The CIT(A) criticized the AO for not making any enquiries or verifying the financials of the Indian agent. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the commission was paid for legitimate business purposes and that the AO's disallowance was based on flimsy grounds without proper investigation.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s deletion of the disallowances of commissions paid to both M/s. Amikong Pte Ltd. and M/s. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to substantiate the commission payments and that the AO had not conducted adequate enquiries to justify the disallowances. The commissions were deemed to be paid for genuine business purposes and were commercially expedient, resulting in significant business revenue for the assessee.

---