Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the corporate debtor should be ordered into liquidation, and whether the liquidator should endeavour to sell the business as a going concern during liquidation.
Analysis: The application for liquidation was allowed after the resolution plan process had failed and the committee of creditors had approved liquidation. The order directed liquidation under Chapter III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, appointed the resolution professional as liquidator, and required compliance with the liquidation framework. The liquidator was also directed to make efforts to sell the company as a going concern in terms of the liquidation regulations, with a fallback to the ordinary liquidation waterfall if such sale did not materialise within the stipulated period. Consequential directions were issued regarding cessation of the moratorium, vesting of powers in the liquidator, public announcement, cooperation by personnel, and discharge of employees subject to continuation of business as a going concern.
Conclusion: Liquidation was ordered, the liquidator was appointed, and a going concern sale was directed to be pursued during liquidation.