Star hotel restaurant tax treatment: higher VAT rate applies only to specified items, with independent assessment required.

A restaurant operating in the same premises as a recognised star hotel may be treated as a restaurant attached to that hotel for Section 7(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The higher rate under that provision applies only to the specified food and beverage items, not to the entire turnover. Interest cannot be levied from the original assessment year where tax liability is quantified later, particularly when the assessee's stand is bona fide. The assessment orders were set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication because the authority had relied heavily on Enforcement Wing material rather than making an independent quasi-judicial decision.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the assessment orders were vitiated for breach of natural justice or want of independent application of mind; (ii) Whether the petitioner's restaurant, operating in the same premises as a recognised star hotel, fell within the scope of Section 7(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006; (iii) Whether the higher rate under Section 7(1)(a) could be applied to the entire turnover and whether interest could be levied from the original assessment year.

Issue (i): Whether the assessment orders were vitiated for breach of natural justice or want of independent application of mind.

Analysis: The assessment record showed issuance of pre-revision notices, receipt of objections, a personal hearing, and recording of the petitioner's representative's statement before the impugned orders were passed. On that basis, the procedural requirement of hearing was satisfied. However, the assessing authority had substantially relied on the Enforcement Wing material and failed to act with the required independence expected of a quasi-judicial authority.

Conclusion: The plea of breach of natural justice failed, but the complaint that the orders were not independently made succeeded.

Issue (ii): Whether the petitioner's restaurant, operating in the same premises as a recognised star hotel, fell within the scope of Section 7(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.

Analysis: Section 7(1)(a) applies to sales of the specified food and beverage items served by star hotels and restaurants attached to such hotels. The restaurant was functioning in the very same premises as the star hotel, and the expression "attached to" was understood as connoting a real nexus of location and connection, not mere separate registration. A restaurant situated in the same building as the star hotel was therefore treated as attached to that hotel.

Conclusion: The petitioner's restaurant was held to fall within Section 7(1)(a), against the petitioner.

Issue (iii): Whether the higher rate under Section 7(1)(a) could be applied to the entire turnover and whether interest could be levied from the original assessment year.

Analysis: The higher rate under Section 7(1)(a) was confined to the items specifically mentioned in that provision and could not be extended to the whole turnover. As regards interest, liability could arise only from the date the tax liability was quantified, not from the original assessment year, particularly where the assessee's stand was bona fide. The assessment was also found to have been influenced by the Enforcement Wing report rather than an independent adjudication.

Conclusion: These levies were held unsustainable to the extent they covered the entire turnover and levied interest from the original assessment year.

Final Conclusion: The assessment orders were quashed and the matters were sent back for fresh adjudication in accordance with law, with the legal position clarified on the scope of Section 7(1)(a), the limited reach of the turnover-based levy, and the commencement of interest liability.

Ratio Decidendi: A restaurant operating in the same premises as a recognised star hotel may be treated as a restaurant attached to that hotel under Section 7(1)(a), but the higher rate applies only to the specified items in the provision and an assessing authority must independently decide the matter without merely adopting the Enforcement Wing's view.

---