Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether packing of china and porcelainwares and glassware was an incidental or ancillary process to the completion of manufacture so as to attract excise duty under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.
Analysis: Excise duty under section 3 is leviable on goods that are produced or manufactured, and section 2(f) defines manufacture to include only such processes as are incidental or ancillary to completion of a manufactured product. Applying the settled meaning of manufacture as the bringing into existence of a new substance known to the market, packing was held not to be an essential part of the manufacturing process for these goods. The goods could be delivered in wholesale without packing, and commercial practice of packing for convenience did not convert packing into a process necessary for completion of manufacture.
Conclusion: Packing was not part of manufacture, and the levy of excise duty on the goods on that basis was invalid.
Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded, the impugned demand orders were quashed, and the Rule was made absolute.
Ratio Decidendi: Packing is not an incidental or ancillary process completing manufacture unless it is legally and commercially necessary to bring the goods into a marketable manufactured form.