Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, claiming exemption under Section 11, is entitled to depreciation on capital assets even though the cost of acquisition of those assets had already been treated as application of income.
Analysis: The issue stood covered by the Supreme Court's ruling in Rajasthan and Gujarati Charitable Foundation, which held that depreciation is allowable to a charitable institution notwithstanding that the acquisition cost of the asset was earlier treated as application of income. The same view had also been applied in the assessee's own earlier appeals. On that basis, the question of law raised by the Revenue no longer survived in its favour.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to claim depreciation on the assets, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A charitable institution is entitled to depreciation on capital assets used by it, even if the cost of those assets has been treated as application of income under Section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.