2021 (4) TMI 276 - HC - Income Tax

Court rules in favor of assessee: no tax liability as unutilized provision not payable, no income accrual

M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd., Versus Income Tax Officer (TDS) -LTU, Bangalore

M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P) Ltd., Versus Income Tax Officer (TDS) -LTU, Bangalore - [2021] 434 ITR 719 (Kar) Issues:Assessment of liability for non-deduction of tax at source under Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for an amount not accrued to payee.Analysis:1. The appeal pertained to the Assessment Year 2012-13, where the assessee, a Joint Venture engaged in manufacturing vehicles, made provisions for expenses as per Accounting Standard -29. The Assessing Officer treated the assessee as 'assessee in default' under Section 201(1) for not deducting tax at source from an unutilized provision amount of Rs. 8,71,32,988. The total payable amount was determined as Rs. 17,10,879.2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the tribunal affirmed the Assessing Officer's order. The assessee contended that no tax liability could be imposed as the unutilized provision amount was not payable to anyone and did not accrue as income. Citing legal precedents, the assessee argued that no tax could be levied in the absence of income accrual.3. The Revenue argued that tax should be deducted when provisions are made, and the order of assessment is based on entries in the books of accounts. They maintained that the assessee was liable to deduct tax under various sections of the Act and supported the tribunal's decision.4. The Court examined Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act, emphasizing that an assessee failing to deduct TDS as required is deemed an assessee in default. It noted that tax deductions were required when payments were made, i.e., when income accrued under the Act.5. Referring to legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in SHOORJI VALLABH DAS, the Court emphasized that tax liability arises upon income accrual. It held that in the absence of income accrual, there is no obligation to deduct tax at source. The Court concluded that as no income accrued to anyone, the liability to deduct TDS could not be imposed on the assessee, quashing the orders of the lower authorities.6. Consequently, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal and quashing the orders of the tribunal, Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and the Assessing Officer.