TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal allowed due to Covid delay & address change; emphasizes right to hearing and justice</h1> The ITAT allowed the appeal, citing the justified delay in filing due to the Covid Pandemic situation and the change of address affecting receipt of ... Best judgment assessment - no reply of notice u/s. 143(2) - there was a proposal to estimate the income at 20% of the turnover - HELD THAT:- It is the claim of the assessee that there was change of address. Consequently, the notices issued by the A.O. and the CIT(A) were never received by him. The assessee has filed an Affidavit stating the reasons of non-appearance before the A.O. and the CIT(A). In the interest of justice and equity, one more opportunity should be granted to the assessee to represent the case before the A.O. Therefore, the entire issue raised in this appeal is restored to the files of the A.O. The assessee shall cooperate with the Department and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments. The A.O. shall afford a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and shall take a decision in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly. Issues:1. Timeliness of filing the appeal before ITAT2. Justification for delay in filing the appeal3. Change of address affecting receipt of notices4. Denial of opportunity of hearing by CIT(A)5. Validity of assessment order and jurisdiction6. Estimation of income at 20% of turnover7. Denial of interest charges under sections 234A, 234B, and 234CIssue 1: Timeliness of filing the appeal before ITATThe appeal was filed before the Tribunal 17 days after the due date. However, the appellant argued that due to the Covid Pandemic situation, the Hon'ble Apex Court had extended the period of limitation. The Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment dated 23.03.2020 allowed an extension of the limitation period from 15.03.2020 until further orders. Consequently, the delay in filing the appeal was considered justified.Issue 2: Justification for delay in filing the appealThe appellant contended that the change of address led to non-receipt of notices from the Assessing Officer and CIT(A). An Affidavit was filed by the appellant affirming the change of address and the inadvertent failure to update the authorities. The appellant requested an opportunity to present necessary material before the Assessing Officer to ensure justice and equity.Issue 3: Change of address affecting receipt of noticesThe change of address by the appellant was claimed to be the reason for not receiving notices related to the assessment proceedings. The Affidavit detailed the circumstances leading to non-receipt of notices and the subsequent actions taken by the appellant upon becoming aware of the assessment orders.Issue 4: Denial of opportunity of hearing by CIT(A)The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal in limine due to the non-appearance of the appellant, without addressing the merits of the case. The appellant argued that the dismissal without providing an opportunity to be heard violated the principles of natural justice.Issue 5: Validity of assessment order and jurisdictionThe assessment for the appellant, an individual, was completed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, estimating the total income at Rs. 31,15,500. The appellant raised concerns regarding the jurisdiction of the authorities and the validity of the assessment order due to non-service of notices.Issue 6: Estimation of income at 20% of turnoverThe authorities proposed to estimate the income at 20% of the turnover due to non-compliance by the appellant. The appellant argued that the estimation was excessive and should be substantially reduced, claiming that the estimated income should not exceed 8% of the gross receipts.Issue 7: Denial of interest charges under sections 234A, 234B, and 234CThe appellant denied liability to be charged interest under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income Tax Act. The issue of interest charges was raised as part of the grounds of appeal, seeking relief from the imposition of interest.In conclusion, the ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, restoring the case to the Assessing Officer for further proceedings with the direction to grant the appellant a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The judgment emphasized the importance of justice and equity in addressing the issues raised by the appellant.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
