Court sets aside initial assessment orders for specific years, upholds deduction eligibility, justifies reassessment based on employment numbers.

The court set aside the initial assessment orders for the years 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's objections. The petitioner's eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB was upheld for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 due to meeting the conditions. However, for 2006-2007, reassessment was justified based on fluctuating employment numbers. The court allowed the writ petitions for 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, dismissing the petition for 2006-2007 without costs, emphasizing independent assessment for that year.

---

---

Issues:
Reopening of assessment for Assessment Years 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007 based on notices and communication challenging eligibility for deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner contested the reopening of assessments for the years 2004-2005, 2005-2006, and 2006-2007. The initial assessment orders were challenged and set aside by the court, directing the respondent to consider the objections raised by the petitioner and pass speaking orders for each Assessment Year.

2. The petitioner argued that for the year 2004-2005, the assessment order already considered the exemption claim under Section 80IB, so there was no basis for reopening. However, for the subsequent years, the petitioner's eligibility for the deduction was disputed, leading to a series of appeals and reversals culminating in the Tribunal allowing the benefit.

3. The petitioner contended that the denial of the deduction for the years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 was based on a change of opinion, contrary to established legal principles. The petitioner also cited precedents emphasizing the requirement of reasons for invoking Section 147 for reassessment.

4. The respondent defended the reopening by highlighting the lack of evidence provided by the petitioner to justify the eligibility for the deduction under Section 80IB. The respondent argued that the conditions for the deduction were not met based on the number of workers employed in the manufacturing process.

5. The court analyzed the requirements for claiming the deduction under Section 80IB, focusing on the number of workers employed in the manufacturing process without or with the aid of power. The court found that the petitioner satisfied the conditions for the deduction in the years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 based on the number of workers employed.

6. The court concluded that there was no justification for reopening the assessment for the year 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, as the issues had been considered and finalized in previous proceedings. However, for the year 2006-2007, where the number of workers employed fluctuated, there were grounds for reassessment under Section 147.

7. The court directed the petitioner to participate in the proceedings for the year 2006-2007 and emphasized that the assessment order for that year should be passed independently on merits. The court allowed the writ petitions for the years 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 but dismissed the petition for the year 2006-2007, with no costs incurred.

---