Supreme Court rules on customs duty dispute over coal classification, emphasizing proper authority for recovery. The Supreme Court quashed an order by the Additional Director General of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, which levied duty and penalty on an ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court rules on customs duty dispute over coal classification, emphasizing proper authority for recovery.
The Supreme Court quashed an order by the Additional Director General of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, which levied duty and penalty on an importer for misrepresenting Bituminous coal as steam coal. The Court held that only the assessing officer who initially cleared the goods can exercise the power of recovery after assessment under Section 28 of the Customs Act. As the show cause notice was issued by the Additional Director General, not the proper officer, the impugned order was set aside, and the writ petitions were allowed with no costs awarded.
Issues: Misrepresentation of imported goods as steam coal, Jurisdiction of the proper officer under Section 28 of the Customs Act
The judgment pertains to writ petitions filed by an importer/company and its Managing Director challenging an order passed by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, levying duty and penalty for misrepresentation of Bituminous coal as steam coal. The petitioners imported steam coal during March to November 2012, with bills of entries filed for each consignment. The Customs authority accepted the classification as steam coal, allowing clearance. However, a show cause notice was issued under Section 28 of the Customs Act, alleging misrepresentation. The petitioners' reply was rejected, leading to the impugned order. The respondent sought to sustain the order, but the petitioner relied on a Supreme Court judgment (M/s.Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs) interpreting "the proper officer" in Section 28. The Supreme Court held that only the assessing officer who initially cleared the goods can exercise the power of recovery after assessment. As the show cause notice was issued by the Additional Director General, not the proper officer, the impugned order was quashed, following the Supreme Court's decision. The writ petitions were allowed, with no costs awarded, and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.