Appeal allowed: Deduction granted for Co-op Society under IT Act. Remand on interest income taxability.

The ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(A) order disallowing the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act for a Co-operative Society. The ITAT directed the A.O. to reconsider the case in line with principles established by the Hon'ble Apex Court. Additionally, the ITAT remanded the issue of taxability of interest income from Co-operative Banks back to the A.O. for fresh consideration, following previous judgments, allowing the appellant to submit further evidence if needed. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act by CIT(A)
2. Taxability of interest earned from deposits with Co-operative Banks u/s 56 of the I.T.Act

Issue 1: Disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I.T.Act by CIT(A):
The appellant, a Co-operative Society, filed a return for the assessment year 2016-2017 claiming a deduction u/s 80P of the I.T.Act. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction stating that the principles of mutuality did not exist between regular, nominal, and associate members of the society, citing a judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court. The CIT(A) upheld this decision. However, the appellant cited a recent judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in favor of the deduction claim. The ITAT Bangalore noted that the A.O. had denied the deduction based on the membership structure, contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in another case. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order and directed the A.O. to reexamine the case considering the principles established by the Hon’ble Apex Court, thereby allowing the appeal.

Issue 2: Taxability of interest earned from deposits with Co-operative Banks u/s 56 of the I.T.Act:
Regarding the interest income earned from fixed deposits with Co-operative Banks, the appellant relied on a judgment of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court to support the deduction claim u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The ITAT noted a previous decision of the Tribunal in a similar case, where the matter was remanded to the A.O. for fresh consideration. The ITAT observed that the source of funds for investments remained the same in different assessment years, and the nature of interest income was identical. Therefore, the ITAT directed the A.O. to reevaluate the issue in light of the judgments of the Hon’ble Apex Court and the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, allowing the appellant to present additional evidence if necessary. Consequently, the ITAT remanded the issue back to the A.O. for fresh consideration, following the directions of the Tribunal. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the ITAT Bangalore, in its judgment, addressed the issues of disallowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) and the taxability of interest income earned from deposits with Co-operative Banks. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A) order for the first issue and directed the A.O. to reexamine the case based on relevant legal principles. For the second issue, the ITAT remanded the matter back to the A.O. for fresh consideration, following the guidance of previous judgments.

---