Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether conversion of natural gas into compressed natural gas amounted to manufacture or production for the purpose of additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the binding view that natural gas, after undergoing compression through plant and machinery, acquires a new commercial form as compressed natural gas. The process was held to result in a product having a distinct name, character and use, which satisfies the statutory test of manufacture under Section 2(29BA) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The contrary reliance on the Central Excise registration and the different meaning of manufacture under excise law did not alter the income-tax test. As the issue of reopening under Section 147 was not independently adjudicated and was treated as academic, the substantive dispute remained confined to eligibility for additional depreciation.
Conclusion: Conversion of natural gas into compressed natural gas was held to be manufacture or production, and the assessee was entitled to additional depreciation under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.