Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14/09/2007 when the goods were sold during the pre-GST period and no sales tax or VAT was payable or collected on such sales.
Analysis: The claim for refund had to be examined only under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus dated 14/09/2007, which allows refund of SAD on payment of appropriate sales tax or VAT on subsequent sale of the imported goods. The authorities below had relied upon Notification No. 34/1998-Cus, which had already been rescinded by Notification No. 58/1998-Cus. The Tribunal held that the issue was already settled in favour of the appellant in earlier proceedings, and that nil rate of VAT or sales tax could still satisfy the condition of payment of appropriate sales tax or VAT. The earlier tribunal view, supported by Circular No. 6/2008, clarified that the refund cannot be denied merely because the rate of VAT or sales tax is nil.
Conclusion: The appellant satisfied the condition in Notification No. 102/2007-Cus and was entitled to refund of SAD.