Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on dredging services and marine consultancy services used for smooth navigation of vessels at a private jetty.
Analysis: The service recipient was the appellant, the service charges and service tax were borne by the appellant, and the services were availed for the appellant's business purpose of ensuring smooth navigation at the jetty. The location where the services were provided was held to be immaterial once receipt of service, payment of consideration, and business use were established. The Tribunal also followed its earlier view that dredging-related services used for business operations at a jetty qualify as input services and that credit cannot be denied merely because the services were obtained outside the factory or at a private jetty.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on dredging services and marine consultancy services was held admissible and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a service is received by the assessee, the consideration is borne by the assessee, and the service is used for the business, Cenvat credit cannot be denied merely because the service is rendered at a location not owned by the assessee.