Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the advance ruling application was maintainable when it was not filed in the prescribed form and the full prescribed fee was not paid.
Analysis: The application for advance ruling was required to be filed in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, and the corresponding provisions under the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. The prescribed fee was Rs. 5,000 under each tax head, and the combined fee payable was Rs. 10,000. As the application was neither filed in the prescribed form nor accompanied by the full fee, it did not satisfy the statutory requirements for an advance ruling application.
Conclusion: The application was non-maintainable and liable to rejection under Section 98(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Final Conclusion: The request for advance ruling could not be examined on merits because the threshold procedural requirements for a valid application were not fulfilled.
Ratio Decidendi: An advance ruling application must strictly comply with the prescribed form and fee requirements, failing which it is liable to be rejected as non-maintainable.