Tax classification requires scrutiny of product nature and materials; inadequate reasoning justified remand for fresh consideration.

In tax classification disputes, entitlement to a concessional rate must be supported by examination of the product's nature and relevant materials, and not by invoices or claimed HSN classification alone. A brief order that does not address the material aspects bearing on the applicable rate of tax is inadequate and calls for reconsideration. The common order was therefore set aside, and the matters were remitted to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

---

---

Issues: Whether the common order of the Tribunal determining the applicable rate of tax on the product required interference and remand for fresh consideration.

Analysis: The order under revision was found to be too brief and to have proceeded mainly on the basis of invoices and the claimed HSN classification. It was held that in tax classification matters, entitlement to a concessional rate must be established by examining the nature of the product and the relevant materials, and that reliance on regulatory treatment alone is insufficient. Since the relevant aspects bearing on the applicable rate of tax were not considered in adequate depth, reconsideration was found necessary.

Conclusion: The common order was set aside and the matters were remitted to the Tribunal for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

---