Genuine trade discount and valuation under excise law accepted where price comparison was unreliable and discount was not excessive.

A 10% discount allowed to a purchaser was treated as genuine for valuation under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The comparison between direct sales and sales routed through the distributor was rejected because the goods sold through the two channels were of different specifications, making the pricing comparison unreliable. The contract price was also lower than the price offered to distributors or selling agents, and the discount was not found to be excessive or an undue consequential benefit. On that basis, the discount was accepted and the challenge to the assessment basis failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the 10% discount allowed to M/s. Delton Sales (P) Ltd. could be treated as genuine and whether the transactions reflected an arm's length basis for assessment under section 4 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944.

Analysis: The difference between direct sales and sales routed through M/s. Delton Sales (P) Ltd. was found not to furnish a proper comparison because goods of different specifications were sold through the two channels. The contract price was lower than the price offered to distributors or selling agents, and the discount allowed to M/s. Delton Sales (P) Ltd. was not found to be excessive or an undue consequential benefit.

Conclusion: The claimed discount was accepted as not excessive, and the challenge to the assessment basis failed.

---