Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether rags and chindies sold by the applicants were covered by Entry 15 of Schedule A to the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 as cotton fabrics, or fell under the residuary entry and were taxable.
Analysis: The expression used in Entry 15 was read with the definition of cotton fabrics in Item No. 12, later Item No. 19, of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. That definition covered all varieties of fabrics manufactured wholly or partly from cotton. The fact that the goods were sold in cut pieces of irregular shape or size, or were purchased for use as raw material in paper manufacture, did not change their character as manufactured cloth. The exemption notification of 5 January 1957 also treated damaged or sub-standard cotton fabrics, including chindies, rags and fents, as cotton fabrics, supporting that understanding of the term. On a plain and grammatical construction, the description was not controlled by the buyer's intended use.
Conclusion: Rags and chindies were cotton fabrics and were covered by Entry 15 of Schedule A. The Tribunal's contrary view was incorrect.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the applicants, and the disputed sales were held not taxable under the residuary entry.
Ratio Decidendi: A tariff or sales tax description of goods must be determined by the statutory definition and the plain character of the goods, and not by the purchaser's intended use or by the fact that the goods are sold in cut or irregular pieces.