TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court: Acknowledgments of liability revive salary arrears, not time-barred, setting aside tribunal decision.</h1> <h3>N. SUBRAMANIAN Versus M/s ARUNA HOTELS LTD. & ANR.</h3> N. SUBRAMANIAN Versus M/s ARUNA HOTELS LTD. & ANR. - [2021] 225 Comp Cas 369 (SC) Issues:1. Interpretation of acknowledgments of liability for arrears of salary.2. Application of limitation period under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.3. Dismissal of a Civil Suit filed by the Corporate Debtor.4. Dispute over arrears of salary and delay in raising the claim.5. Correctness of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's decision in admitting the matter.Interpretation of Acknowledgments of Liability:The appeal involved a former employee claiming arrears of salary from 1998 to 2013 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted the petition based on acknowledgments of liability, including a letter from the Managing Director acknowledging the principal amount. The NCLAT, however, raised a dispute over the arrears and the delay in raising the claim. The Supreme Court held that acknowledgments made the arrears payable and not time-barred, setting aside the NCLAT's decision.Application of Limitation Period:The NCLT correctly admitted the Section 9 application as the acknowledgment made by the Managing Director fell within the limitation period. The Court emphasized that the acknowledgment of liability negated any dispute over the amounts owed to the appellant, rejecting the argument that the claim was time-barred. The Court reinstated the NCLT judgment and dismissed the alternative argument presented by the Respondent's counsel.Dismissal of Civil Suit:The Corporate Debtor filed a Civil Suit challenging the acknowledgments of liability, which the NCLT deemed as an attempt to evade the dues. The suit was later dismissed for non-prosecution, with an application for restoration pending. The Court noted the suit's dismissal and its implications on the acknowledgment of liability.Dispute Over Arrears of Salary and Delay:The NCLAT highlighted a dispute over the arrears of salary and questioned the delay in raising the claim from 1998 to 2016. It held that the application under Section 9 was not maintainable due to the existence of a dispute and the unexplained delay. However, the Supreme Court overturned this decision, emphasizing the acknowledgments of liability and the lack of a genuine dispute.Correctness of NCLAT's Decision:The NCLAT overturned the NCLT's decision, citing a dispute and delay in raising the claim. The Supreme Court disagreed, reinstating the NCLT judgment based on the acknowledgment of liability and the absence of a genuine dispute. The Court allowed the appeal, rejecting the permission to file Civil Appeals.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides insights into the interpretation of acknowledgments of liability, the application of the limitation period, the dismissal of the Civil Suit, the dispute over arrears of salary, and the correctness of the NCLAT's decision, offering a comprehensive overview of the legal issues addressed in the case.
TaxTMI 