Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeals were liable to be dismissed on the ground of low tax effect notwithstanding the plea that the additions arose from information received from the Sales Tax Department about alleged hawala transactions.
Analysis: The tax effect in both appeals was below the revised monetary limit for departmental appeals prescribed by the CBDT circular enhancing the threshold to Rs. 50 lakh. The plea that the case fell within the hawala-related exception was not accepted, no contrary view was brought on record, and the Tribunal followed its own prior decisions declining to entertain such appeals on this basis. The department's liberty to seek restoration if any other exception applied was noted, but that did not alter the present maintainability issue.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeals were not entertained and were dismissed for low tax effect.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the tax effect is below the applicable CBDT monetary limit and no established exception is shown to apply, a departmental appeal is not maintainable and must be dismissed.