Export refund under CENVAT Credit Rules remains available for exempted services, as Rule 5 is distinct from Rule 6.

Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of accumulated or unutilised CENVAT credit on exported final products or output services, and that relief cannot be denied merely because the exported service is exempted. The distinction from Rule 6 is material: Rule 6 addresses exempted goods or services in domestic supply, while Rule 5 is designed to prevent export of domestic tax burden and operates in a different field. On that construction, refund remains available where input or input services are used for exports, and exempt status does not bar the claim. The appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's entitlement to refund was affirmed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether refund of accumulated CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 could be denied merely because the exported output service was exempted; (ii) Whether the scheme of Rules 5 and 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of unutilised credit on exported services notwithstanding exemption.

Issue (i): Whether refund of accumulated CENVAT credit under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 could be denied merely because the exported output service was exempted.

Analysis: Rule 5 is meant to avoid export of duty or tax incidence and permits refund of unutilised credit in respect of final products or output services exported out of India. The Court noted that the language of Rule 5 differs from Rule 6: Rule 6 specifically refers to exempted goods or services, whereas Rule 5 uses the expression final product or output service and does not impose a bar merely because the exported service is exempted. The exemption notification in question operates within India, while export of taxable or exempt services remains permissible.

Conclusion: The refund under Rule 5 cannot be denied solely on the ground that the exported output service was exempted; the issue is answered in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the scheme of Rules 5 and 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 permits refund of unutilised credit on exported services notwithstanding exemption.

Analysis: The Court relied on earlier High Court decisions recognising that Rule 5 and Rule 6 operate in different fields. Rule 6 restricts credit in relation to exempted goods or services supplied domestically, while Rule 5 grants refund where inputs or input services are used for exports. The consistent judicial view was that export should not suffer domestic tax burden, and the assessee is entitled to refund of unutilised CENVAT credit when services are exported.

Conclusion: The scheme of the Rules allows refund of unutilised credit for exported services, and the revenue's challenge fails on this issue as well.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed and the substantial questions of law were answered against the revenue, affirming the assessee's entitlement to refund of accumulated CENVAT credit.

Ratio Decidendi: Refund under Rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 is available for exported final products or output services even if they are exempted, because Rule 5 does not incorporate the restrictive language of Rule 6 and is intended to prevent export of domestic tax burden.

---