Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows appeals, cancels Transfer Pricing adjustments.</h1> <h3>Hacienda Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Asstt. C.I.T., Central Circle – 6 New Delhi</h3> Hacienda Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Asstt. C.I.T., Central Circle – 6 New Delhi - TMI Issues Involved:1. Transfer Pricing adjustment related to interest paid on Fully and Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (FCCDs) issued to Associated Enterprise (AE).2. Application of interest rate benchmark for the FCCDs.3. Justification of the interest rate applied by the assessee versus the rate determined by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).Detailed Analysis:Transfer Pricing Adjustment:The primary issue in these appeals is the Transfer Pricing adjustment made by the Assessing Officer (AO) concerning the interest paid by the assessee to its AE, M/s. Twilzon Limited, on FCCDs issued by the assessee. The FCCDs were issued on 26.07.2011, relevant to the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13. The AO disallowed 300 basis points over the base rate PLR, resulting in the addition of differential interest amounts in A.Ys 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15.Application of Interest Rate Benchmark:The assessee argued that the FCCDs were rupee-denominated and interest payments were made in Indian Rupees, making the LIBOR rate inapplicable. Instead, the assessee applied the SBI PLR rate plus 300 basis points, justifying it as arm's length. The TPO disagreed, citing the lack of documentary evidence supporting the assessee's credit rating and other factors minimizing risk and cost of funds.Justification of Interest Rate:The TPO's observations included:- No documentary evidence for credit rating.- The assessee's ongoing projects indicating good credibility.- Minimized risk due to rupee-denominated transactions.- Lack of justification for administrative costs.- AE's significant investment indicating the assessee's good credibility.The TPO restricted the interest rate to 14.25%, disallowing the additional 300 basis points claimed by the assessee. This resulted in the following differential interest amounts being added:- A.Y. 2012-13: Rs. 5,522,541.04- A.Y. 2013-14: Rs. 8,085,000.00- A.Y. 2014-15: Rs. 8,085,000.00Tribunal's Findings:The Tribunal referred to a similar case of Granite Gate Properties Ltd., where the FCCDs were issued to the same AE under similar terms. The Tribunal had previously accepted the SBI PLR rate plus 300 basis points as reasonable and at arm's length, particularly since the variance in the rate of interest was within the permissible range of 5% as per the second proviso to Section 92C(2) of the Act.The Tribunal noted that the issue was no longer res integra, and no change in circumstances was presented. Therefore, the Tribunal followed the previous decision, concluding that including 300 basis points while calculating the interest rate was reasonable and permissible under law. The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to delete the impugned adjustments.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeals, directing the deletion of the Transfer Pricing adjustments made by the AO/TPO. The order was pronounced in the open court on 22.02.2021, emphasizing the consistency with previous decisions in similar cases.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found