Appeal allowed, liaison office not liable for GST as per Appellate Authority ruling.

The appeal was allowed, and the advance ruling was set aside. The Appellate Authority concluded that the activities of the liaison office do not amount to the supply of services. The liaison office is not required to be registered under GST, and it is not liable to pay GST. The decision highlights that the liaison office's operations, following RBI guidelines and not generating income, do not fall within the scope of 'supply' under GST law.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the activities of a liaison office amount to supply of services.
2. Whether the liaison office is required to be registered under the CGST Act.
3. Whether the liaison office is liable to pay GST.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Activities of the Liaison Office as Supply of Services:
The core issue is whether the activities of the Liaison Office (LO) in India constitute a supply of services under GST law. The LO, established by a foreign entity under RBI permission, is restricted to non-commercial activities like representing the parent company, promoting trade, and acting as a communication channel. The LO operates solely on funds remitted from the head office and does not generate income or engage in trade/commercial activities in India. The RBI and FEMA regulations prohibit the LO from earning any income or charging fees for its activities. The inward remittances received by the LO are not considered as consideration for any service, thus not fitting the definition of 'supply' under Section 7(1)(a) of the CGST Act. The LO's activities are deemed as services rendered to itself, which do not qualify as 'supply' under GST.

2. Registration Requirement under CGST Act:
The LO is not required to register under GST as it does not engage in any taxable supply of goods or services. The CGST Act mandates registration for entities making taxable supplies exceeding a certain turnover, but since the LO's activities do not constitute a 'supply', this requirement does not apply. The LO is an extension of the parent company and not a separate legal entity. Therefore, it does not meet the criteria for registration under Section 22 or 24 of the CGST Act.

3. Liability to Pay GST:
As the LO's activities do not amount to a 'supply' under GST, it is not liable to pay GST. The LO does not engage in any business or commercial activities, and the funds received from the head office are for operational expenses, not for any services rendered. Consequently, there is no taxable event triggering GST liability.

Conclusion:
The appeal was allowed, and the advance ruling was set aside. The Appellate Authority concluded that:
1. The activities of the liaison office do not amount to the supply of services.
2. The liaison office is not required to be registered under GST.
3. The liaison office is not liable to pay GST.

The decision emphasizes that the LO's operations, strictly adhering to RBI guidelines and not generating income, do not fall within the ambit of 'supply' under GST law.

---