TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Impleading of GST Commissioner & Grants Stay on GSTIN Suspension</h1> <h3>FRAMES BAY PRIVATE LIMITED Versus CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COMMISSIONERATE DELHI EAST</h3> The court directed the impleading of the correct party, the Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax, Delhi, as respondent No.2 to the petition. The court ... Erroneous impleadment of Authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax as respondent, instead of the State Authority - HELD THAT:- Issue notice. List on 25th March, 2021. Issues:1. Impleading the wrong authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax as a respondent.2. Granting stay on the suspension of GSTIN of the petitioner.Analysis:1. The judgment addresses the issue of impleading the wrong authority under the Central Goods and Services Tax as a respondent. The counsel for the respondent pointed out the error made by the petitioner in impleading the Central Authority instead of the State Authority. The petitioner acknowledged the mistake and expressed readiness to implead the correct party. Consequently, the Commissioner, Goods and Services Tax, Delhi, was impleaded as respondent No.2 to the petition. The court directed the filing of an amended memorandum of parties, and notice was accepted by all concerned parties, including the newly impleaded respondent. Counter affidavits were to be filed before the next hearing scheduled for 25th March, 2021.2. The judgment also deals with the stay on the suspension of the GSTIN of the petitioner. The court granted a stay on the suspension of the petitioner's GSTIN, which was issued through a notice dated 8th February, 2021. As a result of this order, transactions on the petitioner's GSTIN were permitted to continue until the next hearing date. The stay on the suspension was a temporary measure to ensure that the petitioner's business operations were not unduly affected pending further proceedings in the case. This decision aimed to maintain the status quo and prevent any immediate adverse consequences for the petitioner.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
