Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (2) TMI 1085 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal directs reassessment of income inclusion in international transactions The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-examine the inclusion of miscellaneous income in ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal directs reassessment of income inclusion in international transactions

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-examine the inclusion of miscellaneous income in commission from other liners and to exclude it if unrelated to international transactions. The Tribunal also instructed the TPO to delete the addition of interest on receivables from overseas associated enterprises, citing inapplicability of domestic deposit rates to international transactions. Additionally, the Tribunal invalidated the treatment of reimbursement to Seaways Shipping and Logistics Ltd. as a specified domestic transaction due to the repeal of the relevant provision, restoring the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) for proper adjudication.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Inclusion of miscellaneous income in commission from other liners.
                            2. Interest on receivables from overseas associated enterprises.
                            3. Reimbursement of expenses to Seaways Shipping and Logistics Ltd.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Inclusion of Miscellaneous Income in Commission from Other Liners:
                            The assessee contested the inclusion of gross miscellaneous income of Rs. 6,48,39,254/- as part of the commission from other liners, arguing that this income does not relate to international transactions subject to Arm's Length Price (ALP) adjustment. The lower authorities included this amount, arriving at a total income of Rs. 7,55,03,382/- from other liners. The Tribunal found that this issue required reconciliation rather than substantive adjudication. It observed that the miscellaneous income should not be included in the ALP determination if it is unrelated to international transactions with associated enterprises. The Tribunal restored this issue to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for appropriate adjudication, with instructions to exclude the income if it is found irrelevant to the ALP determination.

                            2. Interest on Receivables from Overseas Associated Enterprises:
                            The assessee challenged the addition of Rs. 6,77,226/- as interest on receivables from overseas associated enterprises, where the TPO had adopted an interest rate of 14.75% based on SBI's short-term fixed deposit rates. The taxpayer argued that the receivables were much higher, and the net result would be negative if interest were charged from both ends. The Tribunal found no merit in the addition, noting that neither the TPO's order nor the DRP's directions clarified the basis for the 14.75% interest rate. It concluded that domestic deposit rates were inapplicable to international transactions involving foreign currency. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the TPO to delete this addition.

                            3. Reimbursement of Expenses to Seaways Shipping and Logistics Ltd.:
                            The assessee disputed the lower authorities' finding that the entire amount of Rs. 6,05,53,454/- paid to Seaways Shipping and Logistics Ltd. did not represent mere reimbursement of expenses. The TPO had treated this segment as a "specified domestic transaction," which was repealed by the Finance Act, 2013. The Tribunal referred to a previous decision (ITA 2213/Bangalore/2018) and noted that the omission of the relevant provision meant it was never part of the statute. Therefore, the proceedings initiated under the omitted clause were invalid. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' actions and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer (AO) to adjudicate the issue of expenditure claims in accordance with the law, after providing an opportunity for the assessee to be heard.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, restoring certain issues to the TPO and AO for re-adjudication and deleting specific additions. The judgment emphasized the need for proper reconciliation and adherence to relevant legal provisions in determining ALP and reimbursement claims.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found