Court Addresses Allegations of Harassment by DGGI Officers, Emphasizes Legal Procedures

The court addressed allegations of undue harassment by DGGI officers, emphasizing adherence to legal procedures and no resorting to undue pressure. Directions were issued to involve CBIC in the proceedings, with the CBIC impleaded as a party respondent. Assurance was given by the officers for no further complaints of harassment, ensuring future inquiries comply with the law. The court stressed the importance of officers acting within legal boundaries and conducting all actions lawfully, scheduling the next hearing with clear instructions for compliance.

---

---

Issues:
1. Allegations of undue harassment by DGGI officers
2. Directions to be issued to CBIC
3. Impleadment of CBIC as a party respondent in writ-applications
4. Assurance of no further complaints of harassment
5. Conduct of officers within the boundaries of the law

Detailed Analysis:
1. The judgment addresses the allegations of undue harassment by officers of the DGGI, Surat. Dr. Satish Dhavale, the Additional Director General, assured that an appropriate inquiry has been initiated to look into the allegations raised in the writ-applications. The court emphasized the need for officers to act within the confines of the law and not resort to undue pressure or threats. The officers were reminded to conduct any inquiries or investigations in accordance with legal procedures to avoid any further complaints of harassment.

2. The court, considering the circumstances, decided to issue directions to the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC). The learned Additional Solicitor General of India, Mr. Devang Vyas, highlighted the necessity to involve the CBIC in the proceedings. It was directed that the CBIC be impleaded as a party respondent in the respective writ-applications, and the cause-title was to be amended accordingly. Mr. Vyas was entrusted with discussing the matter with the CBIC to ensure compliance with the court's directives.

3. In furtherance of the above decision, the court waived the service of notice for and on behalf of the CBIC, and Mr. Vyas was instructed to engage with the highest authority of the CBIC seriously. The CBIC was put on notice to provide reasons if the guidelines specified in the previous order were not to be issued through Circular/Instructions. This step was taken to ensure the involvement and compliance of the CBIC in the ongoing legal proceedings.

4. Dr. Satish Dhavale provided an assurance that there would be no further complaints of harassment, threats, or undue pressure against the officers of the department. It was emphasized that any future inquiries or investigations would be conducted strictly in accordance with the law. This assurance aimed to alleviate concerns regarding the conduct of the officers and to ensure adherence to legal protocols in all proceedings.

5. The court reiterated the importance of officers performing their duties within the legal framework and refraining from taking the law into their own hands. While acknowledging the efforts of officers in combating fraud and tax evasion, the court emphasized the need for all actions to be conducted lawfully. The judgment highlighted the court's stance on conducting search proceedings under Section-67 strictly in accordance with the law. The next hearing was scheduled for further proceedings, with a clear instruction that officers should not join the video conference on the subsequent date, emphasizing the message that all actions must be carried out within legal boundaries.

---