Appeal allowed, reassessment quashed for lack of new material, change of opinion. Original assessment under Section 143(3) stands.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the reassessment order as the reopening lacked new tangible material and amounted to a change of opinion. The original assessment under Section 143(3) stood, with no further assessment of long-term capital gain required.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of reopening the assessment under Section 147.
2. Quantum of long-term capital gain to be assessed.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of Reopening the Assessment under Section 147:

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The appeal was initially complicated by the death of the assessee, necessitating the inclusion of legal heirs. The primary issue revolved around whether the reopening of the assessment was valid.

The original assessment was completed under Section 143(3) on 30.9.2010. The assessment was later reopened by issuing a notice under Section 148 on 30.3.2015, more than four years after the end of the assessment year. The reasons for reopening included the sale of land for Rs. 71,38,845/- which was not shown as capital gain in the return of income. The assessee objected to the reopening, but the objections were rejected by the AO and the CIT(A).

The Tribunal noted that the AO had already considered the sale transaction during the original assessment and had accepted the return filed by the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized that for reopening an assessment, there must be new tangible material, which was not the case here. The original AO had tallied the AIR information with the details provided by the assessee and found no discrepancies. The Tribunal concluded that the reopening was based on a change of opinion, which is not legally permissible. Thus, the reassessment order was quashed.

2. Quantum of Long-Term Capital Gain:

The Tribunal did not delve deeply into the quantum of long-term capital gain since the primary issue of reopening the assessment was resolved in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the original AO had considered all relevant details, including the sale deed and the subsequent dispute over the sale consideration. The assessee had disclosed all material facts fully and truly during the original assessment. Therefore, the Tribunal did not find it necessary to reassess the quantum of long-term capital gain.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the reassessment order on the grounds that the reopening of the assessment was not valid due to the lack of new tangible material and the fact that it was based on a change of opinion. The original assessment under Section 143(3) was upheld, and no further assessment of long-term capital gain was deemed necessary.

---