Fiscal classification by factory size and power use upheld as rational protection for small-scale footwear manufacturers.

Item 17 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 was upheld because the excise classification between footwear manufacturers based on workforce size and power consumption rested on an intelligible differentia. Larger factories were treated as a distinct class, and the exemption for smaller units was accepted as a legitimate fiscal policy aimed at protecting small-scale industry. The classification had a rational nexus with the object of the levy, so the challenge under Articles 14, 19 and 31 failed. The constitutional attack on the footwear excise levy was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether Item 17 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, which imposed excise duty only on footwear produced in factories employing fifty or more workers or using power above the prescribed limit, created an unconstitutional discrimination violating Articles 14, 19 and 31 of the Constitution.

Analysis: The classification was held to be based on an intelligible differentia. Factories employing a larger labour force or greater power were treated as a distinct class because size and scale affect production capacity, economies of scale and market competition. The exemption for smaller manufacturers was regarded as a legitimate fiscal policy designed to protect cottage and small-scale industry from being overwhelmed by larger concerns. Such a classification had a rational nexus with the object of the levy and could not be struck down as discriminatory. Once the levy was upheld as valid, the connected challenge under Articles 19 and 31 also necessarily failed.

Conclusion: The levy under Item 17 was constitutionally valid and the challenge based on Articles 14, 19 and 31 failed.

Final Conclusion: The constitutional attack on the footwear excise levy was rejected, and the petition was dismissed with costs.

Ratio Decidendi: A fiscal classification that distinguishes between large and small manufacturers by reference to workforce and power consumption is valid if it rests on an intelligible differentia and bears a rational nexus to the legislative object, including the protection of small-scale industry.

---