Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appeal dismissed due to procedural non-compliance in procurement from DTA units</h1> <h3>IN RE : MEGA JEWELS PVT. LTD.</h3> IN RE : MEGA JEWELS PVT. LTD. - 2020 (42) G.S.T.L. 353 (Commr. Appl. - GST - Raj.) Issues Involved:1. Rejection of refund claim due to non-compliance with procedural requirements for procurement of goods from Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) units.2. Requirement of furnishing an undertaking for refund claims.3. Applicability of procedural compliance for deemed exports.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Rejection of Refund Claim Due to Non-Compliance with Procedural Requirements for Procurement of Goods from DTA Units:The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), filed a refund claim under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017, for the period of November 2017, amounting to Rs. 5,79,552. The adjudicating authority rejected the claim on the grounds that the appellant did not follow the prescribed procedure for procurement of goods from DTA units as outlined in Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST, dated 6-11-2017. Specifically, the appellant failed to provide prior intimation in Form A, pre-approved by the Development Commissioner, to the registered supplier and the jurisdictional officers.The appellant argued that the procedural requirements were newly introduced in November 2017 and that there was ambiguity and lack of clarity in the procedures. They contended that the procedural non-compliance was of a technical nature and should be condoned, citing legal precedents that support substantial compliance over strict procedural adherence.2. Requirement of Furnishing an Undertaking for Refund Claims:The appellant contested the requirement of furnishing an undertaking as specified in Para 4 of Circular No. 24/24/2017-GST, dated 21-12-2017. They argued that this requirement was applicable only when the supplier of deemed export intended to file a refund claim, not the recipient. The appellant submitted that they had obtained such undertakings from most suppliers to demonstrate compliance, even though it was not mandated for the recipient under the rules.The adjudicating authority held that the undertaking was mandatory in both scenarios—whether the refund claim was filed by the supplier or the recipient. This was further supported by Para 41 of Circular No. 125/44/2019-GST, dated 18-11-2019, which reiterated the need for compliance with the procedural requirements laid down in Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST.3. Applicability of Procedural Compliance for Deemed Exports:The appellant argued that the procedure prescribed by Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST was only applicable to suppliers of goods claiming deemed export benefits under Section 147 of the CGST Act. They contended that as recipients of deemed exports, they were not required to follow this procedure. The appellant also highlighted that there was no system in place for issuing pre-approved Form A by the Development Commissioner, which was confirmed through discussions and written communication with the Development Commissioner, Noida SEZ.The adjudicating authority, however, maintained that the appellant, as a recipient of deemed exports, was required to comply with the procedural safeguards outlined in Circular No. 14/14/2017-GST. The authority emphasized that the procedures were in addition to the terms and conditions of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2015-20 and the duty exemption notifications availed by such units.Conclusion:The adjudicating authority rejected the appeal, concluding that the appellant failed to comply with the procedural requirements for procurement of goods from DTA units and the mandatory furnishing of undertakings. The authority found the appellant's arguments and cited case laws inapplicable to the present case, upholding the initial rejection of the refund claim.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found