Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was maintainable on the ground that the service tax dues were quantified on or before 30.06.2019, and whether the rejection of the declaration was justified.
Analysis: The scheme treated cases under enquiry, investigation or audit as eligible where the tax dues had been quantified on or before 30.06.2019, and quantified meant a written communication of the amount payable. Such written communication could include a letter intimating duty demand, an admission of liability by the declarant, or an audit report. The petitioner's letter dated 10.05.2019 contained a clear admission of service tax liability for the relevant period, which was prior to the cut-off date. The subsequent audit report only referred to that earlier admission and did not alter the fact that quantification had already occurred before 30.06.2019.
Conclusion: The declaration was maintainable and the rejection order was not justified. The petitioner's case fell within the eligible category under the Scheme, and the matter had to be reconsidered afresh.
Ratio Decidendi: For eligibility under the enquiry, investigation or audit category of the Scheme, quantification is satisfied by a pre-cut-off written communication admitting or intimating the duty liability, and it is not necessary that adjudication be completed before the cut-off date.