Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the capital reserve arising from the difference between the consideration paid for acquisition of the undertakings and the net value of the assets taken over was excluded by Explanation 1 to rule 2 of the Second Schedule to the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964, and whether the reserve was includible in the company's capital for surtax purposes.
Analysis: Explanation 1 excludes only a paid-up share capital or reserve brought into existence by creating or increasing, by revaluation or otherwise, any book asset. The reserve in question arose because the assessee took over real and tangible assets and liabilities as a going concern at the approved consideration, and the difference between that consideration and the net worth had to be shown in the accounts as capital reserve. No book asset was created or increased by revaluation. The earlier decision under an in pari materia provision was directly applicable, and the High Court erred in treating the reserve as falling within the exclusion.
Conclusion: The reserve was not hit by Explanation 1 and was includible in the capital of the assessee for surtax computation.
Final Conclusion: The order of the High Court was set aside and the Tribunal's view restoring inclusion of the reserve in capital was restored, resulting in success for the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A reserve arising merely from the excess of the net value of real and tangible assets over the consideration paid on takeover is not a reserve brought into existence by creating or increasing a book asset and therefore does not fall within the exclusion in Explanation 1 to rule 2.