Special Leave Petition dismissed for 1,233-day delay; condonation application rejected, petition on Section 68 addition not heard SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition as barred by a 1,233-day delay; the court found the condonation application's explanation unsatisfactory and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Special Leave Petition dismissed for 1,233-day delay; condonation application rejected, petition on Section 68 addition not heard
SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition as barred by a 1,233-day delay; the court found the condonation application's explanation unsatisfactory and refused to condone the delay. Because of this procedural bar, the petition challenging an addition under section 68 regarding proof of a banked gift from a relative was not entertained on merits and was dismissed on the ground of delay.
The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 1233 days, refusing to condone the delay. Citation: 2021 (2) TMI 190 - SC Order. Justices: Uday Umesh Lalit and K.M. Joseph. Petitioner represented by Mr. Anil D. Nair, Mr. Jogy Scaria, Ms. Beena Victor, Mr. Ravi Lomod, Mr. Reegan S. Bell.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.