Tribunal allows refund claim, sets aside denial under Cenvat Credit Rules.

The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of the refund claim regarding the service not considered an input service under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal held that the Revenue erred in raising the credit availment issue during the refund claim consideration, noting that the dispute was about the refund claim itself. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief to the appellant.

---

---

Issues:
Refund claim denial based on service not considered input service under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.

Analysis:
The appellant, a provider of output services, filed refund claims for unutilized cenvat credit in their account, which were partly sanctioned but denied in part for "rent a cab service" on the grounds that vehicles rented were not registered in the name of the service provider, thus not considered capital goods under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant argued that since they paid service tax under reverse charge mechanism and availed cenvat credit without objection, they are entitled to the credit. The Revenue contended that the service in question did not qualify as an input service under the rules. The Tribunal noted that the dispute was about the refund claim, not the initial availment of the credit, and held that the Revenue erred in raising the credit availment issue during the refund claim consideration. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the denial of the refund claim.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, providing consequential relief to the appellant.

---