Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Authority could attach the assessee's bank account under Section 44 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 during the pendency of an appeal accompanied by a stay application against the assessment order.
Analysis: The writ applicant had already filed an appeal and a stay application, and the attachment of the current bank account was made while the stay request remained undecided. The order records that the issue had already been considered by a coordinate bench and indicates that, in the meantime, coercive recovery by way of bank account attachment should not be pressed further pending appropriate consideration of the stay application.
Conclusion: The attachment was not to be enforced pending further consideration, and the assessee received interim protection against appropriation from the bank account.
Final Conclusion: The order granted interim relief in the tax recovery context and left the substantive dispute open for subsequent consideration.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an appeal with a pending stay application is pending against an assessment order, coercive recovery by attachment of the assessee's bank account should not be pursued without first dealing with the stay request.