Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court imposes Rs. 24 crore costs for tax inaction. Petitioner seeks time for affidavit.</h1> The Supreme Court imposed exemplary costs due to inaction on a tax matter amounting to over Rs. 24 crores from 17.08.2017 to 10.02.2020. The petitioner ... Summary order. Matter listed after two weeks; liberty granted to petitioner to file a better affidavit. Court recorded unexplained inaction from 17.08.2017 to 10.02.2020 and the respondent's contention that VAT has been paid on the transaction, which, according to the respondent, precludes invocation of service tax; the court indicated that consideration may be given to imposing exemplary costs on the next date. The Supreme Court of India, in a 2021 judgment, noted inaction from 17.08.2017 to 10.02.2020 regarding a tax amount exceeding Rs. 24 crores. The petitioner's counsel requested time to file a better affidavit, while the respondent's counsel argued that the appeal lacked merit as VAT had already been paid on the transaction. The court may impose exemplary costs in the next hearing scheduled after two weeks.