Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Allows Dispensation of Shareholder Meetings for Scheme of Arrangement</h1> <h3>In Re : M/s. Bangalore Biotech Labs Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Shelcel Biozeen Technologies Pvt Ltd.</h3> The Tribunal granted the application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013, allowing dispensation of meetings for shareholders and ... Amalgamation scheme - seeking to dispense with convening a meeting of the Shareholders and Creditors of the Demerged Company and Resulting Company for the purpose of considering the proposed Scheme etc. - Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 R/w the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 - HELD THAT:- The Companies have disclosed material information with regard to the Scheme in question. In the normal circumstances, it is the prerogative of concerned Companies to take decisions dictated by commercial expediency and evolve Scheme in their mutual business interest, and the Tribunal is only empowered to examine the Scheme broadly, so as to ensure that the Scheme is prepared in accordance with the provisions law and the interest of all the stakeholders of Companies involved, are taken care of by affording due notice of Scheme, etc. Therefore, in view of the no objections to the Scheme and consents given by the different stakeholders for dispensing with the meetings, as mentioned in the preceding paragraphs, there is no necessity to convene the meetings for the same purpose. In the instant case, all the Companies involved in the case, have filed necessary Certificates given by the Chartered Accountants duly certifying the number of Shareholders, constituting 100% of Equity Shareholding of the Applicant Companies, Secured and Unsecured Creditors of the Demerged Company, Unsecured Trade Creditors of the Applicant Companies constituting greater than 90% in value of the total amount due, and they have also furnished their consent affidavits. There would not serve any purpose to direct to convene the meetings in question. Therefore, it would be just and appropriate to dispense with the meetings as sought for, on the principle of ease of doing business, and to facilitate the Company to file necessary second stage Petition seeking to sanction the Scheme, subject to fulfillment of all statutory conditions, after ordering notices to respective Statutory Authorities. Appeal is disposed of with the following directions: (1) It is hereby dispensed with convening and holding of the meetings of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Companies. (2) It is hereby dispensed with convening and holding of the meeting of the Secured Creditors of the Demerged Company. (3) It is hereby dispensed with convening and holding of the meeting of the Unsecured Creditors of the Demerged Company. (4) It is hereby dispensed with convening and holding of the meetings of the Unsecured Trade Creditors of the Applicant Companies. (5) The Applicant Companies are directed to issue paper notification one in English language 'The Hindu' and one in vernacular language 'Udayavani' about the dispensation of the meetings by this Tribunal, within a period of 10 (Ten) days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. (6) Any party, aggrieved by this Order, is entitled to file miscellaneous application, in the instant Company Application, by seeking appropriate direction(s). (7) The Company is permitted to file necessary Company Petition for the sanction of Scheme of Arrangement in question, in accordance with law. Issues Involved:Application under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013 seeking dispensation of meetings for shareholders and creditors to consider a proposed Scheme of Arrangement.Detailed Analysis:1. Scheme of Arrangement:The application filed by two companies sought to dispense with convening meetings of shareholders and creditors for considering a Scheme of Arrangement under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme involved the demerger and vesting of the Demerged Undertaking from one company into another, subject to confirmation by the Tribunal where the registered offices of both companies are located.2. Certification by Chartered Accountants:Chartered Accountants provided certificates confirming the shareholders and creditors of both companies. Shareholders and creditors, after due verification, consented to the Scheme through affidavits, meeting the requirements of dispensation as per Section 230(9) of the Companies Act, 2013.3. Tribunal's Consideration:The Tribunal, after reviewing the certificates, affidavits, and the Scheme details, observed that all stakeholders had consented to the Scheme and dispensation of meetings. The Tribunal emphasized that it is empowered to broadly examine the Scheme to ensure compliance with the law and the interests of all stakeholders are protected.4. Decision and Directions:Based on the stakeholders' no objections and consents, the Tribunal decided to dispense with the meetings for shareholders and creditors. The Tribunal highlighted the principle of ease of doing business and directed the companies to issue notifications about the dispensation. The companies were permitted to file a necessary Company Petition for the sanction of the Scheme.5. Conclusion:The Tribunal disposed of the application with directions to dispense with all relevant meetings, emphasizing the importance of stakeholder consent and compliance with statutory conditions. The decision aimed to facilitate the companies in moving forward with the proposed Scheme of Arrangement while ensuring transparency and legal compliance.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found